DSpace   Text size: 
TEL: 03-3269-2301 FAX: 03-3269-2421
E-mail: jicaiica-lib@jica.go.jp

Growth and Poverty Reduction >
The Second East Asian Miracle?: Political Economy of Asian Responses to the 1997/98 and 2008/09 Crises >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10685/76

Title: Success as Trap? Crisis Response And Challenges To Economic Upgrading in Export-Oriented Southeast Asia
Authors: Doner, Richard
Keywords: economic upgrading
middle-income trap
Southeast Asia
Issue Date: 30-Mar-2012
Series/Report no.: Working Paper No.45
Abstract: This paper explores the capacities for sustained growth in the export-oriented countries of Southeast Asia, with a focus on Vietnam, Malaysia and Thailand. The paper is especially concerned with the prospects for "upgrading" and moving beyond the "middle-income trap" in Malaysia and Thailand. But the core argument for all three countries is similar: Each has responded relatively well to economic crises with impressive reforms, especially in areas of property rights, macroeconomic policies, and, to varying degrees, financial supervision. With some exceptions, however, reforms have not extended to improving local (indigenous) competitiveness and technological capacities. These limits reflect both successful adjustment in areas noted earlier and the availability of resources, including commodity export revenues, external aid, and migrant / informal labor. The danger is that such "safety valves" will serve to reinforce existing institutional and political arrangements, thus undermining initiatives to improve local competitiveness and linkages so key to upgrading. Of particular interest is the fact that, unlike Western European countries where external exposure and vulnerability have led to various forms of labor incorporation, and unlike in the East Asian NICs, where such vulnerability has led at least to a commitment to shared prosperity (and in Singapore to a peak union's participation in labor market and productivity decisions), labor has remained largely disorganized and excluded from bargaining over key issues in export-oriented Southeast Asia. This argument in turn reflects the contention that crises vary in nature and intensity, that different crises have different impacts on the willingness and capacity of political elites to promote new coalitions and to foster new forms of coordination (i.e. institutions), and that such institutions are especially important for movement into more innovation-based activities and higher income status.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10685/76
Appears in Collections:The Second East Asian Miracle?: Political Economy of Asian Responses to the 1997/98 and 2008/09 Crises

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
JICA-RI_WP_No.45_2012_2.pdf768.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2007 MIT and Hewlett-Packard - Feedback